Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The report says Daniel Kibblesmith rejected an AI-training licence offer for Santa’s Husband, described as $2,500 per book. The commentary’s author also urges writers to refuse permission.
What changed
The report says Daniel Kibblesmith rejected an AI-training licence offer for Santa’s Husband, described as $2,500 per book. The commentary’s author also urges writers to refuse permission.
Dated by publication. The original post is described as from the previous Friday but has not been read. The offer is not generalised as actual income received by all authors.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: individual refusals coexist with organisational efforts toward paid licensing; disputes concern amounts, duration and control of permission.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The report says Daniel Kibblesmith rejected an AI-training licence offer for Santa’s Husband, described as $2,500 per book. The commentary’s author also urges writers to refuse permission.
SRC-0096Date and lines 67–79; commentary reporting the author’s refusal and offer amount; screenshots not individually checked
Literary Hub / Drew Broussard · EN · 2024-11-18
Case
Related documents
DOC-0084HarperCollins is selling their authors’ work to AI tech.Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Literary Hub reports Kibblesmith’s rejection of a training-licence offer.” evt-0098. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.