Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Literary Hub reports Kibblesmith’s rejection of a training-licence offer
The report says Daniel Kibblesmith rejected an AI-training licence offer for Santa’s Husband, described as $2,500 per book. The commentary’s author also urges writers to refuse permission.
SoA welcomes per-book consent while criticising revenue splits and duration
SoA considers separate per-book consent a step forward but opposes a standard 50:50 split and questions continued model use without further payment after a three-year licence expires.
Research question
Individual refusal coexists with organizational support for paid licensing; disputes concern amounts, duration, and authorization control.
Related documents
DOC-0084HarperCollins is selling their authors’ work to AI tech.DOC-0085The SoA responds to the HarperCollins AI licensing dealSources
Literary Hub / Drew Broussard · EN · 2024-11-18
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “HarperCollins AI licensing / Author refusal and SoA’s conditional assessment.” case-0058. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.