Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
OpenAI defendants
Read original source (EN)https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.612697/gov.uscourts.nysd.612697.1496.0.pdf
Reading location
PDF cover, contents, and pages 31–33: conclusion, signature, and filing date; publicly redacted version.
Defendant’s brief, not a court opinion. Argument headings and requests checked, not all reasoning and evidence. Public redactions do not allow inference about sealed contents.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
OpenAI files brief supporting summary judgment
OpenAI filed a publicly redacted brief arguing that pretraining and browsing uses were protected by fair use and other defenses, asking the court to grant its motion.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “OpenAI memorandum supporting summary judgment, NYT ECF 1496.” src-0154. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.