Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
SNAC demanded explicit authorization and fair compensation for training uses, an opt-out for works already used, opposition to abusive replacement of authors by AI and public funding of such replacement, and transparent, traceable generated content.
What changed
SNAC demanded explicit authorization and fair compensation for training uses, an opt-out for works already used, opposition to abusive replacement of authors by AI and public funding of such replacement, and transparent, traceable generated content.
Chronology uses the text version’s stated date, not a law’s effective date. A demand for opt-out is not treated as an established, enforceable deletion mechanism.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: records a French authors’ organization’s early demands on training permission, opt-out, public cultural funding, and professional replacement.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
SNAC demanded explicit authorization and fair compensation for training uses, an opt-out for works already used, opposition to abusive replacement of authors by AI and public funding of such replacement, and transparent, traceable generated content.
SRC-0166Webpage lines 37–55: dated title and five authors’ demands.
SNAC · FR · Date unknown
Case
Related documents
DOC-0154Raising the alarm about generative artificial intelligence, as of July 18, 2023Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Dated SNAC text demands training authorization and cultural labor protection.” evt-0176. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.