Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
Material description
Original text published by the initiator. Counts of 68 on January 7 and 88 in the January 8 update refer to different versions. Technical, environmental, and infringement assessments are the statement’s positions, not independently verified. Ng’s assessment of inadequate NLB ethics materials is explicitly personal.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Related events
Singapore literary community issues joint AI statement to NLB
Literary signatories asked NLB to revise programs that might let generative AI replace development of writing skills, provide more information on ethical and environmental effects, and consult authors and publishers. The statement explicitly did not seek a complete AI ban.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Collective Statement from Singapore’s Literary Community on AI.” doc-0169. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.