ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
CASES / CASE-0126

California AB 2602 / Restrictions on performers’ digital-replica contract provisions

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.

Dates describe collected records, not the full life of the case.
RESEARCH NOTE

The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.

Case chronology

California AB 2602 is signed and chaptered

AB 2602 was approved and filed as Chapter 259 of 2024, adding Labor Code section 927. For new digital-replica performances fixed on or after January 1, 2025, relevant contractual provisions are unenforceable when specified conditions coincide, including replacing the person’s work, insufficiently described uses, and absence of required representation.

United StatesPerformance / Film and television / Music and sound artEVT-0211

Research question

Institutional context in which union demands for digital-replica contract safeguards enter state law. Enforceability of contractual provisions differs from a blanket ban on generated content.

Related documents

DOC-0197AB-2602: Contracts against public policy: personal or professional services: digital replicasDOC-0198Gov. Newsom Signs Union-Championed A.I. Bills at SAG-AFTRA Plaza

Sources

Related cases

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “California AB 2602 / Restrictions on performers’ digital-replica contract provisions.” case-0126. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.