Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
CAGELCO 1 clarifies that disputed poster was not a competition winner
According to Interaksyon, CAGELCO 1 responded on September 13 to a poster suspected of using AI, saying its author had not completed the entry requirements and was not among the winners; the cooperative had given an incentive for submitting work.
Research question
Presents originality disputes in a local poster competition and confusion between submission incentives, eligibility, and national rankings.
Related documents
DOC-0164Digit-AI art? Poster-making contest draws flak for recognizing ‘AI-generated’ workSources
Interaksyon / Philstar · EN · 2024-09-13
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “PHILRECA / CAGELCO 1: digital-poster originality dispute and award clarification.” case-0112. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.