Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Four organisations demand retrospective settlements, data disclosure and fair licensing
DACS, AOI, AOP and PICSEL jointly demand retrospective settlement mechanisms for past unauthorised uses, disclosure of training content and how it was obtained, and fair remuneration for future uses.
Research question
Visual creators’ organizations connect compensation for past use with future licensing negotiations.
Related documents
DOC-0102Our joint statement calling for transparency, fairness and respect for creators’ rights in the age of AISources
DACS / AOI / AOP / PICSEL · EN · 2025-10-16
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “DACS, AOI, AOP, and PICSEL / Joint statement on retrospective compensation and training transparency.” case-0069. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.